|
Linear Polarisation Resistance
The LPR technique is the most frequently used
being both quick and easy. A
small sweep from typically -10 mV to +10 mV at 10 mV/min around the rest potential is
performed. The resulting current/voltage plot usually exhibits a straight line
the
inverse slope of which is proportional to the corrosion rate. The Gill AC
Gill 8 and 12
the Field Machine
the Pocket Machine
the LPR meter and the Bubble Test software all use
this method.

The step method is used in hand held instruments
for example the pocket
machine. The current is measured at points A and B once the initial current surge has
steadied. The voltage sweep results in a response shown above
a best fit straight line
gives the charge transfer resistance. A variant of the LPR test is the pitting index. This
is a measure of the asymmetry between anodic and cathodic current response
a feature built into to the portable LPR meter where it is available as a switched option between
corrosion rate and pitting index. The LPR method is ideal for plant monitoring offering an
almost instantaneous indication of corrosion rate
allowing for quick evaluation of
remedial action and minimising unscheduled downtime. As an example and guide to allow the
new operator to obtain a feeling for the numbers involved the table below gives a
qualitative classification of corrosion rates of carbon steel in a water cooling system.
| Corrosion rate mm/year |
mils/year |
Classification |
| <0.03 |
1.2 |
Excellent |
| 0.03 0.08 |
1.2 3.2 |
Very good |
| 0.08 0.13 |
3.2 5.2 |
Good |
| 0.13 0.2 |
5.2 8 |
Moderate |
| 0.2 0.25 |
8 10 |
Poor |
| >0.25 |
>10 |
Very poor |
To convert a corrosion current in mA/cm2 to a corrosion rate in mm/year
multiply the current by 12.
The sources of error in LPR tests include uncertainty in the parameter B used in the Stern
and Geary equation where icorr = B/Rp
B = (ba.bc)/(2.3(ba+bc))
choice of a scan rate
that is too fast
neglect of the solution resistance and non linearity. In practice a
value of 20 mV usually works well for B
a scan rate of 0.2 mV/sec is often adequate
the
solution resistance can be compensated by positive feedback and the non-linearity error is
only a small percentage of the result. Linear polarisation resistance can be done either
three or two electrodes. The two electrode method relies on both electrodes been similar so
that when they are coupled and offset
the test is still in the linear region. This
matching of electrodes is not needed when using the three electrode method as the
potentiostat measures the rest potential and offsets the test around that.

|